🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to restrict social media access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are observing intently to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing group of countries are considering comparable bans.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our kids' youth". The policy may be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is set to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect children from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential options on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has asked the legislature to pass a proposal increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has advised guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"A strong age restriction is a useful first step," commented one MEP behind the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by robust data".

Earlier, support grew behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the administration committed to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. One foundation established by the family of a teenager who died after being exposed to harmful social media material suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are safe and suitable for young users," commented a influential child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Approach

Stateside, regulation is mostly unfolding at the state government level due to country-wide stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law limiting teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with extra use needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted measures requiring parental consent for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from various figures to mimic the Australian path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Apart from these regions, additional states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, global bodies adopt a more measured stance. Unicef has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

As this global debate evolves, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries show that policymakers internationally are increasingly prepared to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.